Shuck and Jive

Opinions expressed here are my own and do not represent the views of the congregation I joyfully serve. But my congregation loves me!

Sunday, February 28, 2010

I Want To Be An Ancestor--A Sermon

I Want to be An Ancestor
John Shuck

First Presbyterian Church
Elizabethton, Tennessee

February 28th, 2010
Second Sunday of Lent

Genesis 15:1-12; 17-18

Luke 13:31-35


The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) will be meeting in Minneapolis in a few months. Once every two years Presbyterians gather to celebrate, lament, and make decisions in a revelry of Roberts Rules of Order.

Among the many issues that divide us, the General Assembly will consider a report from the Special Committee to Prepare a Comprehensive Study Focused on Israel/Palestine. This committee was formed in 2008. It has not yet finished its report but has made some recommendations. According to the Presbyterian News Service:
The report affirms historic PC(USA) positions — an immediate cessation of violence by both sides, an immediate freeze on the construction and expansion of Israeli settlements on occupied territory, the relocation of Israel’s “separation barrier” to the internationally recognized 1967 border, a shared status for Jerusalem, equal rights for Palestinian citizens of Israel, and immediate resumption of negotiations toward a two-state solution.
The report also calls on the U.S. government to end its acquiescence in the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, and to
“employ the strategic use of influence and the withholding of financial and military aid in order to enforce Israel’s compliance with international law and peacemaking efforts.”
The Simon Wiesenthal Center issued a statement this past Monday saying that the
“adoption of this poisonous document by the Presbyterian Church will be nothing short of a declaration of war on Israel and her supporters.”
The statement from the Wiesenthal Center got results. This past week during meetings in Louisville, Presbyterian leaders were flooded with over 2,700 emails protesting this committee and its report, even as the report has yet to be completed.

We are warming up for another thrilling General Assembly.

Meanwhile Jesus sits on the hill weeping over Jerusalem, like a mother hen who
“longs to gather her brood under her wings.”
Sadly, as usual, no one is willing to be gathered.

Today we read the story of Abraham who is promised descendants as many as the stars in the sky. YHWH tells him:
‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates the land of the Kenites, the Kenizzites, the Kadmonites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.’
Of course the Girgashites and the Kadmonites and today, the Palestinians, might raise an objection. Hey, how do we fit into this great plan?

In the Gospel of John, the following words are put on the lips of Jesus:
“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but by me.”
Of course, the Hindus, pagans, the doubters and the descendants of Abraham might raise an objection. Hey, how do we fit into this great plan?

In the Qur’an we read:
"But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."
Of course the Christians, and the pagans and the Jews might raise an objection. Hey how do we fit into this great plan?

Samir Selmanovic in his book, It’s Really All About God: Reflections of a Muslim Atheist Jewish Christian, writes:







“Whenever a creature claims to have an exclusive grasp of God, someone gets hurt.” P. 141.









Samir Selmanovic is a minister in New York City. His book is a plea for religions to find a way to be good for all people. Rather than to see ourselves as a blessing to others (as long as "they" become like "us"), our evolution will require us to recognize that others are a blessing as they are.

The only God worth worshiping is a God that is outside of our religious boundaries. He writes:

‘Each of our three Abrahamic religions makes two claims. First is the claim we agree on: “God is One.” Second is the claim we deny we are making: “We are in charge of God....” Quietly, over the ages, our religions have colonized the name of God and become God management systems.” P. 91.
There is a way to come to terms with these exclusive texts. In fact, there are many ways. Throughout history we have changed the way we read texts. We do it because we read it with “the other” and the other becomes a subject engaged with us rather than an object..

Selmanovic, speaking of the exclusive texts I mentioned from all three monotheistic religions, writes:
“…the meaning of these texts will change if they are read in the presence of the other….when their eyes look into ours, the life context of our interpretation will change and so will the interpretation of the text. Not just the tenor of it but its basic logic. When God visits us through the other, we are awakened and begin to feel what we could not feel before, we see what we could not see before, and we think what we could not think before. In the presence of the other, everything changes.” P. 261.
That may be the central theme of his book.

The "other" is really us.


Only with that recognition will our religions be a blessing.

There have been harsh and I think deserved criticisms of religion surfacing these days. The title alone of Christopher Hitchens' book, God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything makes the point rather clearly.

I think Hitchens is absolutely partially right. When he is right, he is right absolutely. It is certainly not difficult to find examples that prove Hitchens’ thesis.

But he is not totally right. It is authors like the gracious Selmanovic who have allowed doubt, love, and life to shape his religion into something life affirming for everyone.


In regards to being right, Selmanovic includes this poem by Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai entitled: “The Place Where We Are Right:”
From the place where we are right
Flowers will never grow
in the spring.

The place where we are right
Is hard and trampled
Like a yard.

But doubts and loves
Dig up the world
Like a mole, a plow,

And a whisper will be heard in the place
Where the ruined
House once stood.
I titled the sermon, “I Want to be An Ancestor.” I heard this statement from Nancy Ellen Abrams, author of the book, The View from The Center of the Universe. It was a phrase that jolted me a bit.

The promise of many descendants is not automatic. She was not referring to her own biological offspring. She was talking about the survival of the human race itself.

  • Will we have descendants?
  • Will there be in the future people who look back to this time and to us as ancestors?

Implied in this desire is that the actions we make today may influence whether or not we do have descendants. Certainly not everything is up to human agency. Even with our best intentions we may make decisions that end up doing more harm than good.

Yet the statement, “I want to be an ancestor” affirms that we do have some choice. Our future is not fated. It is not predestined. We are not programmed for destruction or for glory. We have a choice to participate consciously in life.

Perhaps that is really what is being asked of us: to be conscious of the moment in which we live and to have an intent for the life and well-being of future generations.


According to the Great Binding Law, the Constitution of the Iroquois Nations, we find that crucial ethic:
“In our every deliberation we must consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations.”
I think that statement should have the authority of religious dogma. It should be the creed of every religious group. It should be the pledge of allegiance that every schoolchild recites in the morning. It should be the mission statement of every educational and political institution and the guiding principle for every corporation.
“In our every deliberation we must consider the impact of our decisions on the next seven generations.”
Just to be conscious of it might be enough to tip us toward life rather than death.

We can read the story of Abraham in a narrow, provincial manner as the promise of real estate by Bronze Age deity to a particular tribe. In one sense that is exactly what it was. But the passage can have a more than that meaning. We can read it as promise of life and the inspiration to creativity for all people on this globe regardless of religion, or nationality, or ethnicity.

We can read the story of Jesus who wishes to gather his brood under his wing as another story that promotes Christian exclusivism. Everybody will be gathered up by our Jesus. Or we can read it as a symbol of compassion and security and the inspiration to make justice, unity, and peace for all people of Earth regardless of our divisions.

We can prove Christopher Hitchens right again and again that religion poisons everything, or we can discover the wisdom, beauty, and poetry from of all of our varied and rich religious traditions and use them to serve life,
to serve all of life,
and to serve life seven generations to come.

15 comments:

  1. John, you have a heart as big as the human species. It is everyone's biggest challenge to expand their heart to encompass our species -- to identify first as a human and only later and less importantly as a member of this religion or that country. Then harm done to the species and its future would clearly be harm done to me and something I must oppose. If people would stop the violence long enough to think about it, all substantive differences could be negotiated and resolved with this premise: that everyone's first loyalty is to the human species. It's the kind of principle that really simplifies matters, like the idea in custody cases that the interest of the child should be primary.

    I do want to be an ancestor, but what I really want is to be an honored ancestor, not a reviled one. That's another choice we have to make.

    Thank you for the great sermons!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Nancy! You made my day! Yes--an honored ancestor!

    Blessings..

    ReplyDelete
  3. My logic many years ago use to be that I happened to belong to the "one true religion" and that even other Christian denominations, other than mine, where deceptions of the Devil to keep people out of my church. Well, I've grown past that notion, and while I don't know enough about religions like Hindu or Islam to say yes or no, for Christianity, it is, as the title of the book in the post says: "It is really about God." It isn't about the people of Israel or this church or that church. The Bible is all about God, who He is, what His character is like, and IMO how we should obey Him. John told me all are welcome on this site, including me, but he, in a gentle way, wondered why I was on this site. I have an answer that I'd like to share, but given my long winded answers, I'll break it with a separate post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The blogger Chris Richards (Eclectic Radical) had a link to this site, he had some issues that caused him to take a break from blogging, and I started looking at other sites. The initial impression on this site was that Mr. Shuck was pretending to be someone he wasn't. I've already learned in my life not to rely too much on first impressions. After reading his posts and links and doing self examination of my own beliefs, I came to the surprising conclusion that there was a fraud, and that fraud was me. Aside from who's view of the Bible is more accurate or not, how much would qualify as historic fact or not, the bottom line is I talk one set of ideas but often act/behave based on contrary ideas. I can't speak for another person. It is almost funny to think that Mr. Shuck writes about his doubts of the Bible, but in secret would believe every word is literal fact! I may still visit this site to say hi to people I've met that I already consider friends, particularly Snad, trekker,and yes, even you John, but I believe God wanted me to learn some things about myself,my own doubts which lead to inconsistencies between what I say and what I do. As far as I can tell, the lesson I was to learn is complete. Thanks all, Love, Mike

    ReplyDelete
  5. Life can be considered nothing but learning lessons, Mike. Keep going!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tony Kushner takes "reading in the presence of the other" to the nth degree in his shocking play, "Only We Who Guard the Mystery Shall Be Unhappy." http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030324/kushner
    Shocking, but it makes the point.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Mike.

    Wow. I appreciate your honesty. To be honest, I have been a little taken back by your straightforwardness.

    I have had people comment here who did so (sometimes from their own admission)

    1) to either trip me up by trying to get me to write some thing juicy enough for them to report,

    2) to hassle, or

    3) to try to convert other readers to their truth of the gospel. They want to 'save my sheep.'

    Chalk my vigilance regarding you up to paranoia as my spiritual gift.

    You are more than welcome to comment and be one of the "regulars." Your views are important.

    You bring up something interesting.

    I think there is an aspect of Christianity (and of any religion that is based on revelation) that is inherently dishonest or that requires duplicity from its adherents.

    This has been a theme throughout my blog. Even the title, Shuck and Jive, while a riff off my surname is really a metaphor for the Christian life (and my own duplicity in it).

    While Christianity claims to be about truth (the truth that sets us free) history and present experience show it all too often to be about power and assent to the will of those who claim to hold the keys to the kingdom.

    We see the hope of Truth through a glass ceiling and run into the hard surface of dogma long before we reach it.

    We see this in pulpits (especially in mainline churches) in which ministers who are not willing or able to share what they know with their parishioners play 'let's pretend' rather than be honest about their own doubts.

    Wish I had a buck for every time I have been accused of violating my ordination vows or told that I should not be a minister.

    If the ordination vows are little more than a trope for assenting to dogma, they are probably right. But if the vows I took have something to do with an honest search then I trust I am still in the game.

    None of that means I am not a fraud. "If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." I don't even know what I don't know about myself.

    If you think yourself a fraud, you are welcome here. We all are.

    Peace...

    ReplyDelete
  8. David R,

    Whoa...that was shocking and did make the point.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks all,
    I do feel welcome here, I'm not sure I'll be a regular but we shall see what tomorrow will bring. I hope if any future comments I make sound like attacks or pot shots, they may be just that but they will be meant in a fun and gentle way. I do like to joke. And if I can "leave them laughing" I always try to do that. Heard the one about one guy asks another if he believes in evolution or creation? The guy answers? "Both, I believe some men evolved from apes and some were created by God." The other says:"That's ridiculous!" The man answers: "You're just jealous."

    ReplyDelete
  10. "The kiss [of Jesus] glows in my heart.

    But.

    I adhere to my ideas."

    Yup.

    ReplyDelete
  11. One way to support compassion and reconciliation among the advocates of all of our planet's great wisdom traditions is to sign the Charter for Compassion and spread the word about it.

    Over 40,000 have signed.

    love,
    john

    ReplyDelete
  12. Concerning the PCUSA support of Palestinian Justice, what does the Simon Wiesenthal Center specifically consider so poisonous and a declaration o0f war against Israel? It seems to me that our longstanding policy simply supports international law. What's wrong with that?

    love,
    john

    ReplyDelete
  13. @john

    Thanks for the Charter for Compassion link. I signed.

    Check the article from the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

    Overreaction I think.

    ReplyDelete