Shuck and Jive

Opinions expressed here are my own and do not represent the views of the congregation I joyfully serve. But my congregation loves me!

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Anti-War Protest in Jonesborough--er Jonesborough?

At times I wish I could be in more than one place at one time. We had a great blessing of the animals service today at the church. We blessed numerous dogs, a few cats, a horse, and a parrot. I will post some pics soon. Following that a wedding.

While I was blessing and marrying, about 20 miles away, 350 (?) people protested the war in Jonesborough as part of the protest effort held in several cities across the country today. Protests were held in San Francisco, New York, Boston, and several other big cities. Here is a report from MSNBC. So why Jonesborough?

Here is a report from today's rally in Jonesborough from Tricities.Com (Bristol Herald/Channel 11 Johnson City). Oddly enough the reporter said nary a word about the reason Jonesborough was selected.

Let's see if there are other reports. Nothing yet in the JC Press. Nor the Kingsport Times News. The day is not over. Perhaps stories are being written.

It is kind of at least a curiosity story. Why of the eleven major cities was Jonesborough, TN worth the effort of the organizers of United for Peace and Justice? Is not anyone even slightly curious?

Perhaps Jonesborough was selected because it is the host of the National Storytelling Festival? Maybe because it has quaint little shoppes downtown? Might not a local reporter wonder why a little Dogpatch like Jonesborough was chosen? If I were a reporter, I think I would ask that question.

To the unasked question, here is the answer. Jonesborough is home to an Aerojet plant. This is from their homepage:
Aerojet continues to meet emerging defense and aerospace propulsion needs and is well-positioned to benefit from the increased focus on and funding of defense and space programs.
Here is a hot tip for investors. You can make money with these guys.

Jonesborough is one of Aerojet's locations. The Jonesborough location is called Aerojet Ordinance. Here they use depleted uranium to make the hard shell for projectiles. Depleted Uranium (DU) is the by-product of a uranium nuclear reaction.

The problem with DU is that it is radioactive. Don't be fooled by the word, "depleted." This is from the Military Analysis Network:
In military applications, when alloyed, Depleted Uranium [DU] is ideal for use in armor penetrators. These solid metal projectiles have the speed, mass and physical properties to perform exceptionally well against armored targets. DU provides a substantial performance advantage, well above other competing materials. This allows DU penetrators to defeat an armored target at a significantly greater distance. Also, DU's density and physical properties make it ideal for use as armor plate. DU has been used in weapon systems for many years in both applications.

Depleted uranium results from the enriching of natural uranium for use in nuclear reactors. Natural uranium is a slightly radioactive metal that is present in most rocks and soils as well as in many rivers and sea water. Natural uranium consists primarily of a mixture of two isotopes (forms) of uranium, Uranium-235 (U235) and Uranium-238 (U238), in the proportion of about 0.7 and 99.3 percent, respectively. Nuclear reactors require U235 to produce energy, therefore, the natural uranium has to be enriched to obtain the isotope U235 by removing a large part of the U238. Uranium-238 becomes DU, which is 0.7 times as radioactive as natural uranium. Since DU has a half-life of 4.5 billion years, there is very little decay of those DU materials. (Read More)


According to professor Marc Herold of the University of New Hampshire:

DU burns intensely and is very hard. DU is also much cheaper than the substitute metal, tungsten. In effect, the U.S. military is trading off lower costs for increased health hazards. The health dangers of using DU-munitions have now been widely recognized, hotly debated and reported upon and need not be repeated here. Beyond just the health consequences, DU-munitions must be considered weapons of mass destruction insofar as the consequences of their usage are indiscriminate. (Read More)

The radioactive dust is blown in the wind. Not only are innocent civilians harmed but even our own soldiers are suffering the effects and have been for some time.

But then again. Aerojet is a nice place. You can have a good career there. It brings jobs and money to East Tennessee. Our reporters know not to ask too many questions.

For those still curious, here are some links about Depleted Uranium:

YouTube video by Dr. Doug Rokke (U.S. Army Health Physicist and Nuclear Medicine Sciences Officer)

Depleted Uranium Education Project

Military Analysis Network

Campaign Against Depleted Uranium

Deployment Health Clinical Center

5 comments:

  1. I have a feeling Minister Shuck would completely phase out our military, if he somehow had the authority.

    Of course the truth about DU is nothing like he represents it here. It is minimally hazardous, except to people in tanks that are hit by it.

    And that's the point. It's a weapon that is so effective against enemy tank armor that Saddam started a world-wide propaganda campaign distorting its effects in hopes of getting it banned after he lost hundreds of tanks in GW one.

    There's been dozens of studies and post-conflict analyses investigating the possible health dangers posed by DU. Virtually all of them, from those done by the U.N. to those done by the the U.S. military, have concluded that DU is relatively harmless to humans or the environment.

    But what IS harmful is to mislead people into thinking their homeland has been radiated by the "Great Satan".

    This is far from true, and to participate in this smear campaign, led by conspiracy kooks like Doug Rokke, is extraordinarily ignoble.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Monkey!

    And Alan, thanks for your opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Other radical statements by liberal extremists:

    "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God."

    "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile."

    "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I say to you, love you enemy and pray for those who persecute you, so you may be children of your Father in heaven... For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have?"

    "Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword."

    On the scientific front, depleted uranium is if nothing else a heavy metal (not unlike mercury, lead or cadmium) and therefore can have serious health and ecological consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "On the scientific front, depleted uranium is if nothing else a heavy metal (not unlike mercury, lead or cadmium) and therefore can have serious health and ecological consequences".

    Sure, but it's all in the dose. The amounts of DU expended and the portion of that converted to a harmful form is miniscule.

    I'm afraid there's really no legitimate scientific support for the apocalyptic proclamations that are made about a tiny, tiny amount of DU dust that only a tiny, tiny fraction of people are ever exposed to anyway. Even THOSE people have shown few ill-effects.

    I think it's incredibly irresponsible to participate in the demonization of this effective weapon of war, minus the benefit of legitimate scientific proof that it's anywhere close to deserving such a hideous reputation.

    The damage done to international relations is hard to gauge, but this kind of garbage regularly appears in foreign media, which is often under state control, to be used as a propaganda hammer with which to distract from their own *abuses.

    * "Today, I am echoing the pain and suffering of women and men who endured intolerable tortures, but refused to succumb to the shame of surrender to religious fascism. 120,000 of them were sent before firing squads, but did not bow to dictatorship."

    How about throwing a little support Maryam's way, Pastor, and a little less toward the regime that is actively suppressing her and millions of others, who would simply like to have a chance at enjoying some of the same liberal democratic freedoms that you take for granted?

    ReplyDelete